February 8, 2023
REMEMBER THAT CONTROVERISAL CASE THAT THE SUPREME COURT DECIDED NOT TO HEAR??? WELL, IT’S BACK… SORT OF.
YOU MAY REMEMBER THE INTERNET WENT CRAZY OVER THIS POTENTIAL SUPREME COURT CASE CALLED BRUNSON VS ADAMS BACK IN JANUARY. A GUY NAMED RALAND BRUNSON SUED 385 MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE STARTING WITH REPRESENTATIVE ALMA ADAMS ALONG WITH PRESIDENT BIDEN, VICE PRESIDENT HARRIS AND FORMER VICE PRESIDENT PENCE.
BRUNSON’S CASE CLAIMS ALL THOSE LAWMAKERS BROKE THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE BY VOTING TO CERTIFY THE ELCTORS OF THE ELCTORAL COLLEGE ON JANUARY 6 2001 MAKING JOE BIDEN THE PRESIDENT. BRUNSON SAID THEY ALL CHOSE NOT TO INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGATIONS OF ELECTION FRAUD, FOREIGN ELECTION INTERFERENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS IN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. AS A RESULT, BRUNSON WANTS ALL 385 LAWMAKERS, PLUS BIDEN AND HARRIS REMOVED FROM OFFICE AND NONE OF THEM INCLUDING FORMER VP PENCE TO EVER BE ABLE TO HOLD AN OFFICE AGAIN.
I REPORTED IN THIS VIDEO IN EARLY JANUARY THE SUPREME COURT DECIDED NOT TO HEAR BRUNSON’S CASE. AS IS THEIR RIGHT. THE SUPREME COURT GETS THOUSANDS OF PETITIONS FROM PEOPLE WANTING THE JUSTICES TO HEAR THEIR CASE EVERY YEAR. THE JUSTICES ONLY PICK A FEW. BACK IN JANUARY THEY SAID BRUNSON’S CASE WASN’T GOING TO MAKE THE CUT. WELL AFTER THAT DENIAL — ON JANUARY 23 BRUNSON ASKED THE SUPREME COURT TO RECONISDER THEIR DECISION. AND THE SUPREME COURT ADDED BRUNSON’S CASE BACK TO ITS UPCOMING CONFERENCE LIST. CONFERENCES ARE HELD SEVERAL TIMES DURING THE TERM. THE JUSTICES GET TOGETHER IN ONE ROOM AND DECIDE WHICH CASES TO HEAR FROM THIS LOOOOOOOOOOONG LIST. YOU CAN SEE BRUNSON’S CASE IS BACK ON. RIGHT HERE. BUT HERE’S THE REALITY, IT IS VERY, VERY UNLIKELY THAT THE SUPREME COURT WOULD EVER ACCEPT ANY CASE AFTER IT’S ALREADY BEEN DENIED.
IF YOU’RE KEEPING TRACK, THE CONFERENCE DATE IS FEBRUARY 17.
Look at the upcoming Cert pool (conference cases) here.
